Logo de l'Ined Logo du site Datained
  • Accueil
  • Catalogue
  • Publications
  • Open Data
  • Guide
  • A propos
  • Connexion
    Connexion
    Accueil / Catalogue de données central / BIO / IE0216C / variable [F40]
BIO

Migrations between Africa and Europe - MAFE Ghana (2009-2010)

Ghana, Netherlands, United Kingdom, 2009 - 2010
Obtenir les microdonnées
ID de référence
IE0216C
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48756/ined-IE0216C-1009
Producteur(s)
BEAUCHEMIN Cris
Collections
Enquêtes biographiques
Métadonnées
Documentation au format PDF DDI/XML JSON
Page web de l'étude
Créé le
Mar 04, 2022
Dernière modification
Jul 15, 2024
Consultations
616790
Téléchargements
5275
  • Description de l'étude
  • Description des données
  • Téléchargements
  • Obtenir les microdonnées
  • Publications connexes
  • Ensembles de données associés
  • Fichiers de données
  • gh_qb_union
  • gh_qb_children
  • gh_qb_house
  • gh_qb_activity
  • gh_qb_assets
  • gh_qb_mig_attempts
  • gh_qb_migration
  • gh_qb_return
  • gh_qb_network
  • gh_qb_short_return
  • gh_qb_short_stay
  • gh_qb_citizenship
  • gh_qb_asylum
  • gh_qb_residence_permit
  • gh_qb_work_permit
  • gh_qb_transfer
  • gh_qb_association
  • gh_qm_household
  • gh_qm_indiv
  • gh_qb_general

Specify the respondent's comments (o6_l)

Fichier de microdonnées: gh_qm_household

Aperçu

Valide: 1184
Type: Discret
Largeur: 127
Intervalle: -
Format: character

Questions et instructions

Formulation de la question
O6. Did the respondent make any comments on the survey?
If "Yes" => Which ones?
Catégories
Valeur Catégorie le cas
. 1090
92.1%
.b 6
0.5%
2 2
0.2%
A GOOD SURVEY 1
0.1%
ABOUT THE LONGEVITY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE 1
0.1%
ALOT OF THESE KIND HAS BEEN DONE BUT NO OUTCOME TO HELP THE PEOPLE 1
0.1%
C4 1
0.1%
DID NOT SEE THE NEED TO GIVE THE PERSONAL PERSONAL DATA OF HIS FAMILY 1
0.1%
DIFFICULTY IN RECOLLECTING AGES 1
0.1%
HE NEED MONEY NOT QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
HE WAS UNAWARE OF THE SURVEY BUT WAS WILLING TO RESPOND 1
0.1%
HOW AUTHENTIC THE RESEARCH WAS 1
0.1%
HOW WILL THIS SURVEY HELP US? 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE 2
0.2%
IMPORTANCE OF STUDY 4
0.3%
IMPORTANCE OF STUDY. 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE OF SURVEY 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY 1
0.1%
IT IS TOO BULKY AND VOLUMINOUS 1
0.1%
IT WAS TOO LENGTHY & PERSONAL THEY DON'T HAVE TIME FOR BIO 1
0.1%
IT'S IMPORTANCE 1
0.1%
IT'S IMPORTANT 1
0.1%
ITS IMPORTANCE 1
0.1%
ITS SIGNIFICANCE 1
0.1%
MOST OF HIS ANSWERS ARE VERY PRIVATE 1
0.1%
MOST OF THE QUESTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT TO HER 1
0.1%
NOT CONVINCED ABOUT THE NEED FOR THE SURVEY 1
0.1%
NUMEROUS OF SUCH SURVEY HAVE RESULTED IN NOTHING BENEFICIAL FOR THEM 1
0.1%
QUESTIONS SO MANY 2
0.2%
QUESTIONS TOO MANY 2
0.2%
QUESTIONS TOO MANY AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SAID ITS TOO LENGTHY 1
0.1%
SAID THE QUESTIONAIRE IS TOO LENTHY 1
0.1%
SHE DOES NOT SEE THE NECESSITY OF IT. 1
0.1%
SHE DOESN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING 1
0.1%
SHE DOESN'T KNOW ANYTING ABOUT IT 1
0.1%
SHE SAID THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY/LONG 1
0.1%
SHE SHID THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY. 1
0.1%
SHE WANTED A GIFT SINCE SHE HAD PARTAKEN IN A SURVEY WHERE GIFTS WERE GIVEN TO HER 1
0.1%
SHE WAS NOT LISTED SO WOULD NOT PARTICIPATE 1
0.1%
SHE WAS NOT NOTIFIED 1
0.1%
SHE WAS UNAWARE OF THE SURVEY.THIS MIGHT BE BECAUSE SOMEONE RESPONDED ON HER BEHALF DURING THE LISTING 1
0.1%
SHE WAS WORRIED ABOUT THE QUESTIONS OF WHICH SHE CONSIDERED AS TOO MANY 1
0.1%
SO MANY SURVEYS BUT NOTHING IS HEARD ABOUT THEM 1
0.1%
SOME OF THE QUESTIONS DEMANDED ANSWERS WHILE WERE PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WERE PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SOME QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL, EG NO OF PLOTS 1
0.1%
THE ACE OF 02,AND PROFESSION OF 02 1
0.1%
THE OUTCOME SHOULD BRING A CHANGE IN THE LIVES OF GHANAIANS 1
0.1%
THE QUESTION WAS TOO PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE IS TOO BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO DETAILED AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TOO DETAILED 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE PRIVATE AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO DETAILED 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO MANY 3
0.3%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL & A RESPONDENTS NEVER SUPPOSE TO GIVE THE NAME WHEN ANSWERING. AGES SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN A RANGE 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL WHICH INVADES PRIVACY. 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS WERE TOO PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUSTIONS ARE TOO MANY 1
0.1%
THE SURVEY DOESN'T BRING ANY BENEFIT 1
0.1%
THE TOPIC OF THE SURVEY WAS TOO SENSITIVE 1
0.1%
THESE QUESTIONS ARE LESS IMPORTANT 1
0.1%
THIS SURVEY SHOULD NOT BE CONDUCTED ON RESPONDENTS FOR FREE. 1
0.1%
THIS WILL NOT CHANGE ANYTHING IN LIVES 1
0.1%
TOO MANY QUESITIONS 1
0.1%
TOO MANY QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
TOO MANY UNECESSARY QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
WE SHOULD HAVE ADDED MONEY TO IT 1
0.1%
WHAT ARE ALL THESE FOR 1
0.1%
WHAT ARE YOU GIVING ME AFTER ANSWERING ALL THE QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
WHAT BENEFIT WILL IT GIVE HIM 1
0.1%
WHAT IS THE NEED FOR THESE QUESTIONS. 1
0.1%
WHAT WILL BE THE OUTCOME OF STUDY 1
0.1%
WHAT WILL IT BE USED FOR 2
0.2%
WHY ALL THE PERSONAL QUESTIONS ABOUT HER FAMILY AND HER HISTORY 1
0.1%
WHY THESE PERSONNAL QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
YOU COME AND WASTE OUR TIME WITHOUT GIVING US MONEY 1
0.1%
Attention : ces chiffres indiquent le nombre de cas trouvés dans le fichier de données. Ils ne peuvent être interprétés comme des statistiques sommaires de la population d'intérêt.

Description

Univers
If o6 in 1
Source d'informations
Interviewer
Revenir au catalogue
Catalogue d'enquêtes et de données de l'Ined

© Catalogue d'enquêtes et de données de l'Ined, All Rights Reserved.