Migrations between Africa and Europe - MAFE Ghana (2009-2010)
Ghana, Netherlands, United Kingdom, 2009 - 2010
Accéder aux données
ID Ined
IE0216C
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48756/ined-IE0216C-1009
Producteur(s)
BEAUCHEMIN Cris
Collections
Métadonnées
Créé le
Mar 04, 2022
Dernière modification
Jul 15, 2024
Consultations
316466
Téléchargements
2685
- Fichiers de données
- gh_qb_union
- gh_qb_children
- gh_qb_house
- gh_qb_activity
- gh_qb_assets
- gh_qb_mig_attempts
- gh_qb_migration
- gh_qb_return
- gh_qb_network
- gh_qb_short_return
- gh_qb_short_stay
- gh_qb_citizenship
- gh_qb_asylum
- gh_qb_residence_permit
- gh_qb_work_permit
- gh_qb_transfer
- gh_qb_association
- gh_qm_household
- gh_qm_indiv
- gh_qb_general
For what reason was she/he reluctant (e1a)
Fichier de données: gh_qb_general
Aperçu
Valides:
183
Type:
Discret
Longueur:
244
Intervalle:
-
Format:
character
Question(s) et instruction(s)
Question
E1A. For what reasons was he/she reluctant to participate? And which arguments enabled you to convince him/her in the end?
Modalités
| Valeur | Modalité | Cas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| .b | 38 |
20.8%
|
|
| 1.FIRSTABOUT THE TIME DURATION OF BETWEEN 1 TO 2 HOURS WAS TOO LONG FOR HIM. 2.WAS AFRAID THE INFORMATION WOULD BE USED AGAINST GHANAIANS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| A STUDY FROM LEGON. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| ACCORDING TO HIM, CATHOLIC PRIESTS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO GRANT INTERVIEWS ON THEIR PERSONAL LIFE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| AFTER READING THROUGH THE 1ST PAGE WAS A BIT CONCERNED ABOUT THE QUESTIONS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| BECAUSE HE DID NOT HAVE HIS RESIDENCE PERMIT AND THOUGHT IT WAS FOR POLICE. I EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES AND NOTHING WAS GOING TO THE POLICE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| BECAUSE SHE DID NOT HAVE THE TIME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| BECAUSE SHE JUST CAME BACK FROM WORK AND HAD A SORE THROAT. TOLD HER IT WON'T TAKE THAT LONG AND THAT ITS DIFFICULT GETTING HER AGAIN. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| BECAUSE THE INTERVIEWER CONTACTED HIM BY PHONE AND HE DIDN'T KNOW WHO HE WAS, BUT AFTER EXPLAINING WHO AND TELLING HIM WHO RECOMMENDED HIM HE FINALLY AGREED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| BY LETTING HER KNOW THAT IT IS PURELY FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSE AND NOTHING WILL LEAD TO HER AS HER FIRST NAME AND YEAR OF BIRTH WILL BE RECORDED AND NO ADDRESS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| CAUTIOUS AT WHICH QUESTIONS WERE GOING TO BE ASKED AND WHO THE QUESTIONNAIRES WOULD EVENTUALLY GO TO | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| COMPLEMENTING ABOUT THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY AND WHY HIM. I EXPLAINED THE ANONYMITY OF THE SURVEY TO HIM. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| CONCERNED IT WOULD TAKE LONG | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| COULDN'T REMEMBER EVERYTHING | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT FIND THE TIME. I PROMISED TO DO WITHIN AN HOUR | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT HAVE THE REQUISITE DOCUMENTS TO STAY OR WORK IN THIS COUNTRY- AN OVER STAYER. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT HAVE THE TIME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT HAVE TIME. HE ALSO DID NOT TRUST THE INTERVIEWER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT HAVE TIME. I PROMISED IT WAS NOT GOING TO TAKE A MAXIMUM OF 1 HOUR | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT NEED HER ACTUAL DATE OF BIRTH, I.E. DAY, MONTHA AND YEAR. ONLY ''YEAR''. INTERVIEWED HER FRIEND FIRST | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE OBJECTIVE OF THE RESERACH | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DID NOT WANT TO DISCLOSE HER CONFIDENT INFORMATION | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DOES NOT MANY PEOPLE TO KNOW ABOUT HER PERSONAL LIFE. FOR RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY IS ASSURED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| DURATION WAS A PROBLEM. WE AGREED TO HAVE THE INTERVIEW IN THE SHOP SO SHE WOULD NOT HAVE TO 'MAKE'TIME ESPECIALLY FOR INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| EGO REPETEDLY ASKED ME WHETHER ALL THE INFORMATION WOULD REMAIN ANNONYMOUS AND DECIDED TO GIVE PSEUDONAMES FOR SOME PEOPLE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| EGO WASN'T SURE IF HE WOULD BE ABLE TO ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS, DID THIS AS A FAVOUR TO ME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| FINDING TIME TO TAKE PANT WAS DIFFICULT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| FROM MY CONVERSATION WITH HER IT APPEARS SHE MIGHT LIKE TO GO BACK GHANA | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HAD TO EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HAS NOT BEEN INFORMED EARLIER ON OR BEFORE THE INTERVIEW. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFIED EARLIER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE CIOMPLAINED OF NOT HAVING TIME FOR INTERVIEW THAT WILL LAST FOR MORE THAN ONE HOUR. I PROMISED TO DO MY BEST TO FINISH EARLY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE CLAIMS HE DOES NOT HAVE A LOT OF TIME TO SPARE. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE DEMANDED THAT WE BUY HIM FOOD | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE DID NOT HAVE MUCH TIME. HE WAS TOLD BY A PREVIOUS RESPONDENT THAT IT INVOLVED MUCH TIME. I EXPLAINED THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PROJECT. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE HAS NO MONEY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE HAS NOT BEEN NOTIFIED BEFORE THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE IS UNDOCUMENTED AND WAS THINKING IT CAN LEAD TO ESPOSING THE DOCUMENTS. TOLD HIM THAT NOTHING WILL LEAD TO HIM AND ALL THIS IS FOR STUDY PURPOSES AND THAT ALSO NAME AND ADDRESS WILL NEVER LEAD TO HIM. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE THINKS HE HAS NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR THIS AND WHY SHOULD I BE A PART OF SUCH A VENTURE. I TOLD HIM THERE IS NO WAY HE COULD BE TRACED SINCE HIS PERSONAL DETAILS REMAIN ANONYMOUS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE THOUGHT IT WAS GOING TO BE USED FOR MIGRATION PURPOSES. HE GAVE ME THE CHANCE TO DO AFTER THE EXPLANATION OF THE RESEARCH | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WANTED TO KNOW FOR WHAT THE RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH WOULD SERVE. HE WAS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF THE RESPONSES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WANTED TO UNDERSTAND WHY THIS STUDY ID BEING UNDERTAKEN. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS A LITTLE BUSY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS NOT AWARE OF THE PROJECT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS NOT AWARE OF THE STUDY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS PLANNING TO GO TO TOWN FOR A MEETING | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS PREPARING TO LEAVE FOR WORK | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS TIRED AND ALSO EVERYTHING ABOUT THE SURVEY IS HIS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WAS TIRED OF TALKING | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| HE WASN'T SURE OF WHERE I WAS COMING FROM. I HAD TO SHOW HIM MY ID CARD & LETTER OF INTRODUCTION TO GIVE CREDENCE TO WHAT I WAS CLAIMING | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I DON'T NEED HIS DAT OF BIRTH AND OTHER DEAILTS LIKE HIS HOME ADDRESS ETC. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO INTERVIEW EGO'S HUSBAND BUT ONLY REALISED BEFORE STARTING THE INTERVIEW TAHT HE DID NOT MEET ONE OF THE REQUIREMENT CRITERIA. WHEN EGO REALISED THAT SHE WAS ELIGIBLE, SHE WAS HAPPY TO HELP. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I TOLD HER ABOUT THE POSSIBLE BENEFITS OF THE RESEARCH | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| I TOLD HIM THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION AND THAT HIS EXPERIENCE WOULD BE EXTREMELY VALUABLE FOR THIS STUDY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH EXPLAINED TO HIM | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| IMPORTANCE OF STUDY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| INITIALLY EGO DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHY I WAS CALLING HER AND DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK TO ME. BUT AFTER I EXPLAINED WHO I WAS SHE AGREED TO SET UP AN INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| INTERVIEW WAS TOO LONG. CAME BY COUPLE OF TIMES, SP EVENTUALLY HE AGREED TO PARTICIPATE. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| INTERVIEWER HAD TO REASSURE HIM THAT INFORMATION GIVEN COULD NEVER BE TRACEABLE TO HIM. HE STILL CLAIMED IT IS TRACEABLE BUT IN THE END HE DECIDED TO TAKE PART | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| IT IS TIME WASTING AND NO BENEFITS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| IT WILL NOT BRING HIM MONEY, SAID IT WILL ONLY TAKE A WHIILE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| MATTER OF TRUST, WAS AFRAID OF QUESTIONS AND ANONIMTY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| MOSTLY RESEARCH TENDS TO BE WASTE OF TIME AND THAT NOTHING COMES OUT OF IT, I TOLD HIM THIS IS NOT ONE OF SUCH AND THAT SOMETHING POSITIVE WOULD COME OUT OF THIS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| NO REASON, HE WOULD'NT TELL ME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PERSONAL ISSUES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| PERSUADED HIM OF THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| RESPONDENT WAS RELUCTANT TO REVEAL PRIVATE INFORMATION AND REFUSED TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS AS PER HER RIGHTS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SAID THE TIME FOR THE INTERVIEW WAS GOING TO BE TOO MUCH. INTERVIEWER ASSURED THAT IT WAS GOING TO BE SHORT AND PRECISE IF HE WENT STRAIGHT TO THE POINT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DID NOT AGREE TO DO THE LISTING AND HER YOUNGER SISTER WROTE HER NAME. I HAD TO EXPLAIN TO HER THAT WE WERE HARMLESS AND WAS JUST A STUDY AND NOT SAKAWA AS SHE CLAIMED. SHE WAS ALSO SCARED TO GIVE OUT ALL THOSE INFORMATION | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH TIME TO SPEND, SINCE SHE CLAIMS SUCH SURVEYS TAKE ABOUT 2 HOURS TO COMPLETE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DID NOT KNOW ME SO WAS RELUCTANT. TOLD HER INRERVIEW INFORMATION WILL BE CONFIDENTIAL. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DID NOT TELL US WHY SHE WONT PARTICIPATE UNTIL I TOLD HER WE ARE STUDENT'S UNDERTAKING A STUDY ON THE ESSENCE AND EFFECT OF MIGRATION. I OBSERVED THAT SHE JUST CAME OUT OF A RELATION WITH A MIGRANT SO SHE WAS SAD THROUGHOUT THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DIDN'T SEE THE REASON WHY I INTERVIEWED THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD AND STILL WANTED TO INTERVIEW HER TOO | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DIDN'T WANT TO DISCLOSE ANYTHING ABOUT HERSELF | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DOES NOT SEE THE NEED FOR THIS SURVEY. I CONVINCED HER THAT IT WILL BE USED FOR POLICY FORMULATION. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE DOESN'T SEE THE ESSENCE OF WASTING HER TIME TO ANSWER A QUESTIONNAIRE AND ALSO THE BENEFIT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE FELT RESEARCH WAS A WASTE OF TIME. TOLD HER RESEARCH LIKELY TO HAVE AN IMPACT ON POLICY AND MAY IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS OF MIGRANTS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE FELT SO LONG AS THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD HAS BEEN INTERVIEWED THERE IS NO NEED SHE IS ALSO INTERVIEWED. I TOLD HER IT IS DONE INDIVIDUALLY AND THE HEAD HAD TO COME IN AND ALSO CONOINCED HER. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE HAD RESPONDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONAIRE AND HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT IT BEING BULKY. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE HAD TO PAY FOR HER MARRIAGE (SHOM) AND THOUGH DID DIVORCE THE PERSON WAS NOT GOING TO SOLVE INTO IT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE HAS OR IS USING HER OWN NI NUMBER TO WORK. HER ARGUMENT IS THAT SHE IS NOT TAKING MONEY FROM THE SYSTEM BUT RATHER ADDING TO IT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE IS TOO BUSY AND THINKS THAT IT IS A WASTE OF TIME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE JUST WASN'T INTERESTED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE SAID SHE WAS AFRAID I TOLD HER WE WERE STUDENTS AND HAD NO BAD INTENTION | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE SAID SHE WAS AFRAID. I TOLD HER WE ARE STUDENT AND AS SUCH THERE IS NO CAUSE TO FEAR | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE SAID SHE WAS SICK AND COULD NOT PARTICIPATE. BUT DID THE INTERVIEW BECAUSE SHE HAD HEARD ABOUT INTERVIEWER THROUGH FRIENDS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS A BIT RELUCTANT TO PARTAKE, BUT I MANAGE TO PERSUADE HER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS AFRAID. I TOLD HER WE WERE STUDENTS AND I HAVE ALREADY INTERVIEW HER MOTHER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS ATTENDING TO A FRIEND BUT I TOLD HER TO GRANT ME A NEW MINUTES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS BUSY AND DID NOT HAVE TIME. I CONVINCED HER BY TELLING HER WE'VE BEEN THERE TWICE AND NEVER MEET HER, SO SHE SHOULD KINDLY SPARE US SOME TIME. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS BUSY AND DID NOT HAVE TIME. I PLEASED WITH HER TO SPARE ME SOME FEW MINUTE OF HER TIME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS HESISTATING AND GOING FALSE INFORMATION ABOUT THE COUNTRY THE HUSBAND RESIDES IN UNTIL WE TALKED FOR A LONG TIME TO ESTABLISH RAPORE. SHE SAID SHE WAS AFRAID BECAUSE THE HUSBAND HAD TOLD HER PEOPLE MIGHT COME UNDER COVER TO SYPHONE INFO | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS IN A HURRY TO ATTEND A FUNERAL BUT I HAD TO PLEAD WITH HER TO CO-OPERATE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS JUST NOT INTERESTED. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS JUST RELUCTANT AND WAS DEMANDING MONEY. I TOLD HER WE ARE STUDENTS UNDERTAKING THIS STUDY AS PART OF OUR REQUIREMENTS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS NOT AWARE OF THE STUDY AND SO WAS RELUCTANT I JUST EXPLIAN THE WHILE STUDY AND ITS ESSENCE TO HER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS NOT INFORMED BEFORE THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS NOT INTERESTED AND EVEN DENIED EVER LIVING OUTSIDE GHAT. I HAD TO TELL HER I AM A STUDENT AND WE ARE EMBARKING ON SOME STUDIES ON MIGRATION. EVEN WITH THAT SHE WAS NOT RESPONDING WELL TO SOME QUESTIONS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS NOT READY TO GIVE OUT THE INFORMATION BECAUSE SHE WAS AFRAID OF "SAKAWA" I HAD TO PLEAD AND CONVINCE HER THE INTERVIEW HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH "SAKAWA". | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS NOT SURE WHAT THE INFORMATION WAS GOING TO BE NEEDED FOR. THAT IT WILL ENABLE THE POLICY MAKERS SEE HOW MIGRANTS CONTRIBUTE TO THEIR NATION AND ALSO WHERE THEY LIVE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS SUSPICIOUS OF THE PURPOSE AND REMARKED SHE HAD TALKED TO OTHER GHANAIANS WHO DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE SURVEY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WAS TIRED OF TALKING. I ONLY CONVINCED HER ON THE IMPORTANCY OF THE SURVEY TO INFORM POLICY MAKERS ON THE WAY FORWARD. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WASN'T INFORMED ABOUT THE SURVEY EARLIER TIME. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SHE WASN'T VERY MUCH CONVINCED THAT THE INFORMATION SHE WAS GOING TO GIVE WILL BE KEPT AWAY FROM STATE AUTHORITIES. I HAD TO HANG ON MY INTEGRITY. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| SUSPICIOUS ABOUT THE MOTIVE OF THE RESEARCH WORK ESPECIALLY WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF GHANA AS A PARTNER | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| TALKING ABOUT HIS NO OF PARTNERSHIPS IN MIGRATIONAL STATUS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THAT IT WAS CONFIDENTIAL | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THAT WE SHOULD UNDERTAKE PROFITABLE STUDIES LIKE HOW GHANAIANS CAN MIGRATE WITHOUT HAVING ANY PROBLEM AND THIS WILL BRING SOME BENEFIT TO THE GOVERNMENT JUST AS THE PHILIPPINES DO. I TOLD HER WE WILL TAKE HER SUGGESTION INTO CONSIDERATION AND T | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THAT WE WOULD KNOW WHY MOST GHANANIAN MIGRANTS ARE NOT SKILLED WORKERS AND BE ABLE TO HELP THEM | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WILL BE OVER IN SOME FEW MUNITES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE ENTERVIEW WILL TAKE SOME FEW MINUTES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE FACT THAT IT WAS ON IMMIGRATION ON THE ISSUES REGARDING HER PAST. I MADE HER TO UNDERSTAND WE DON'T WANT HIS ACTUAL DATE OF BIRTH JUST YEAR | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE GIFT GIVING WAS VERY LITTLE HE NEEDED MONEY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEW WILL TAKE SOME FEW MINUTES | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE WAS INITIALLY SCEPTICAL ABOUT THE STUDY. BECAME HAPPY ONCE I EXPLAINED MORE AND GAVE HIM THE MAFE LEAFLET | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE ISSUES ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS / SPOUSES AND VISA OR IMMIGRATION STATUS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE PERSON DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHY GHANIANS WERE CHOSEN INSTEAD OF NIGERIANS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE QESTIONNAIRE WAS BULKY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO MANY AND VERY PRIVATE. TO HELP IN PROPER PLANNING AND POLICIES. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE RESPONDANTS MOTHER WHO HAPPINS TO BE AN OLD LADY REALLY WANTED. DBS SURE OF WHERE AM COMING FROM THE ESSENCE OF THE INTERVIEW BY ALLOWING THE DAUTHER, BECAUSE EXPERINCE. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE RESPONDED CLARIFIED ON HIS OWN ACCOUNT AT THE BEGINNING THAT HE WAS UNDOCUMENTED AND WANTED TO KNOW WHETHER THIS WAS A PROBLEM FOR ME. I SAID THAT MANY PEOPLE WERE IN HIS SITUATION AND INCLUDING HIS STORY WOULD HELP US REFLECT A REPRESENTAT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THE TIMING FOR THE INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THERE WAS NOTHING TO GAIN | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THINKING IT CAN BE TRACED TO HER . SHE WAS AGREED OF NEVER TO USE HER REAL NAME OR DATE OF BIRTH AND ADDRESS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THINKS SHE DOES NOT HAVE TIME TO SPEND LISTENING TO THESE QUESTIONS | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THIS IS A GUY I BOOKED APPOINTMENTS THREE TIMES BUT NEVER SUCCEEDED TO HAVE HIM SIT IN INTERVIEW WITH ME. HE WAS A BIT APPRHENSIVE UNTIL I INSISTED ON CONFIDENTIALITY AND STOOD ON MY INTEGRITY. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| THOUGHT THE QUESTION WILL LEAD HER TO THE AUTHORITIES TO BE ARRESTED. INTERVIEWER WAS ABLE TO CONVINCE HER THAT IT WAS ONLZ FOR RESEARCH AND THAT AND THAT NOTHING WILL LEAD TO HER ADDRESS OR LAST NAME | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| TIME FACTOR BUT HE FINALLY AGREED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| TIME TO DO INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| TOO BUSY. HAD TO USE PERSISTENT TO GET HER TO INTERVIEW | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| TOO MUCH PERSONAL INFORMATION EXPOSED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| UNKNOWN | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WANTED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT THE INTERVIEW WAS FOR | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THIS INTERVIEW WAS FOR, AFTER EXPLANATION AGREED | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WANTED TO KNOW WHICH PURPOSE THE RESEARCH DOES HAVE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WANTED TO UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERVIEW/RESEARCH. I EXPLAINED IT TO HER, I.E. THE NEED FOR PROPER INFORMATION | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS BUSY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS BUSY WITH BABI, I WILL NOT TAKE MUCH OF HER TIME. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS NOT COMFORTABLE TO ABOUT GIVING HER LIFE HISTORY. I TOLD HER I DID NOT NEED HER ACTUAL DATE, I.E. DAY, MONTHA ETC BUT YEAR IS OK. EVENT MUST BE TRUE BUT CAN CHANGE NAMES OF CHARACTERS. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS RELUCTANT TO PARTICIPATE INITIALLY, I CONVINCED HER TAHT IT WAS CONFIDENTIAL/PRIVATE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS SCEPTICAL ABOUT THE RESEARCHER. SHE THOUGHT THE INFORMATION WOULD BE USED FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES. | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS SUSPICIOUS OF THE PURUPOSE OF THE INTERVIEW, HER HUSBAND HAD TO CONVINCE HER TO PARTIICPATE | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WAS UNWILLING TO TELL ME HER PERSONAL INFORMATION. I TOLD HER ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IS CONFIDENTIAL AND NOT TO ANY AUTHORITY | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WASN'T CONVINCED ENOUGH ABOUT THE WHOLE PROJECT | 1 |
0.5%
|
|
| WHY WOULD SOMEONE WANT SO MUCH INFORMATION? THAT IT WAS FOR OWN GOOD AND THAT OF GENERATIONS TO COME THAT POLICY MAKERS WOULD KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING | 1 |
0.5%
|
Attention : les chiffres ci-dessus ne sont pas pondérés.
Description
Univers
If e1 in 2, 3
Unité de réponse
Interviewer