• Accueil
  • Catalogue
  • Publications
  • Open Data
  • Guide
  • A propos
  • Admin
    Admin
    Accueil / Catalogue / BIO / IE0216C / variable [V2214]
BIO

Migrations between Africa and Europe - MAFE Ghana (2009-2010)

Ghana, Netherlands, United Kingdom, 2009 - 2010
Accéder aux données
ID Ined
IE0216C
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48756/ined-IE0216C-1009
Producteur(s)
BEAUCHEMIN Cris
Collections
Enquêtes biographiques
Métadonnées
Documentation au format PDF DDI/XML JSON
Page web de l'étude
Créé le
Mar 04, 2022
Dernière modification
Jul 15, 2024
Consultations
435343
Téléchargements
3634
  • Métadonnées
  • Dictionnaire de données
  • Ressources téléchargeables
  • Accéder aux données
  • Bibliographie
  • Références reliées
  • Fichiers de données
  • gh_qb_union
  • gh_qb_children
  • gh_qb_house
  • gh_qb_activity
  • gh_qb_assets
  • gh_qb_mig_attempts
  • gh_qb_migration
  • gh_qb_return
  • gh_qb_network
  • gh_qb_short_return
  • gh_qb_short_stay
  • gh_qb_citizenship
  • gh_qb_asylum
  • gh_qb_residence_permit
  • gh_qb_work_permit
  • gh_qb_transfer
  • gh_qb_association
  • gh_qm_household
  • gh_qm_indiv
  • gh_qb_general

Specify the respondent's comments (o6_l)

Fichier de données: gh_qm_household

Aperçu

Valides: 1184
Type: Discret
Longueur: 127
Intervalle: -
Format: character

Question(s) et instruction(s)

Question
O6. Did the respondent make any comments on the survey?
If "Yes" => Which ones?
Modalités
Valeur Modalité Cas
. 1090
92.1%
.b 6
0.5%
2 2
0.2%
A GOOD SURVEY 1
0.1%
ABOUT THE LONGEVITY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE 1
0.1%
ALOT OF THESE KIND HAS BEEN DONE BUT NO OUTCOME TO HELP THE PEOPLE 1
0.1%
C4 1
0.1%
DID NOT SEE THE NEED TO GIVE THE PERSONAL PERSONAL DATA OF HIS FAMILY 1
0.1%
DIFFICULTY IN RECOLLECTING AGES 1
0.1%
HE NEED MONEY NOT QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
HE WAS UNAWARE OF THE SURVEY BUT WAS WILLING TO RESPOND 1
0.1%
HOW AUTHENTIC THE RESEARCH WAS 1
0.1%
HOW WILL THIS SURVEY HELP US? 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE 2
0.2%
IMPORTANCE OF STUDY 4
0.3%
IMPORTANCE OF STUDY. 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE OF SURVEY 1
0.1%
IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY 1
0.1%
IT IS TOO BULKY AND VOLUMINOUS 1
0.1%
IT WAS TOO LENGTHY & PERSONAL THEY DON'T HAVE TIME FOR BIO 1
0.1%
IT'S IMPORTANCE 1
0.1%
IT'S IMPORTANT 1
0.1%
ITS IMPORTANCE 1
0.1%
ITS SIGNIFICANCE 1
0.1%
MOST OF HIS ANSWERS ARE VERY PRIVATE 1
0.1%
MOST OF THE QUESTIONS ARE IRRELEVANT TO HER 1
0.1%
NOT CONVINCED ABOUT THE NEED FOR THE SURVEY 1
0.1%
NUMEROUS OF SUCH SURVEY HAVE RESULTED IN NOTHING BENEFICIAL FOR THEM 1
0.1%
QUESTIONS SO MANY 2
0.2%
QUESTIONS TOO MANY 2
0.2%
QUESTIONS TOO MANY AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SAID ITS TOO LENGTHY 1
0.1%
SAID THE QUESTIONAIRE IS TOO LENTHY 1
0.1%
SHE DOES NOT SEE THE NECESSITY OF IT. 1
0.1%
SHE DOESN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING 1
0.1%
SHE DOESN'T KNOW ANYTING ABOUT IT 1
0.1%
SHE SAID THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY/LONG 1
0.1%
SHE SHID THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY. 1
0.1%
SHE WANTED A GIFT SINCE SHE HAD PARTAKEN IN A SURVEY WHERE GIFTS WERE GIVEN TO HER 1
0.1%
SHE WAS NOT LISTED SO WOULD NOT PARTICIPATE 1
0.1%
SHE WAS NOT NOTIFIED 1
0.1%
SHE WAS UNAWARE OF THE SURVEY.THIS MIGHT BE BECAUSE SOMEONE RESPONDED ON HER BEHALF DURING THE LISTING 1
0.1%
SHE WAS WORRIED ABOUT THE QUESTIONS OF WHICH SHE CONSIDERED AS TOO MANY 1
0.1%
SO MANY SURVEYS BUT NOTHING IS HEARD ABOUT THEM 1
0.1%
SOME OF THE QUESTIONS DEMANDED ANSWERS WHILE WERE PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SOME OF THE QUESTIONS WERE PERSONAL 1
0.1%
SOME QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL, EG NO OF PLOTS 1
0.1%
THE ACE OF 02,AND PROFESSION OF 02 1
0.1%
THE OUTCOME SHOULD BRING A CHANGE IN THE LIVES OF GHANAIANS 1
0.1%
THE QUESTION WAS TOO PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE IS TOO BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONAIRE WAS TOO DETAILED AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS TOO DETAILED 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS BULKY 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE PRIVATE AND PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO DETAILED 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO MANY 3
0.3%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL & A RESPONDENTS NEVER SUPPOSE TO GIVE THE NAME WHEN ANSWERING. AGES SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN A RANGE 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS ARE TOO PERSONAL WHICH INVADES PRIVACY. 1
0.1%
THE QUESTIONS WERE TOO PERSONAL 1
0.1%
THE QUSTIONS ARE TOO MANY 1
0.1%
THE SURVEY DOESN'T BRING ANY BENEFIT 1
0.1%
THE TOPIC OF THE SURVEY WAS TOO SENSITIVE 1
0.1%
THESE QUESTIONS ARE LESS IMPORTANT 1
0.1%
THIS SURVEY SHOULD NOT BE CONDUCTED ON RESPONDENTS FOR FREE. 1
0.1%
THIS WILL NOT CHANGE ANYTHING IN LIVES 1
0.1%
TOO MANY QUESITIONS 1
0.1%
TOO MANY QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
TOO MANY UNECESSARY QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
WE SHOULD HAVE ADDED MONEY TO IT 1
0.1%
WHAT ARE ALL THESE FOR 1
0.1%
WHAT ARE YOU GIVING ME AFTER ANSWERING ALL THE QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
WHAT BENEFIT WILL IT GIVE HIM 1
0.1%
WHAT IS THE NEED FOR THESE QUESTIONS. 1
0.1%
WHAT WILL BE THE OUTCOME OF STUDY 1
0.1%
WHAT WILL IT BE USED FOR 2
0.2%
WHY ALL THE PERSONAL QUESTIONS ABOUT HER FAMILY AND HER HISTORY 1
0.1%
WHY THESE PERSONNAL QUESTIONS 1
0.1%
YOU COME AND WASTE OUR TIME WITHOUT GIVING US MONEY 1
0.1%
Attention : les chiffres ci-dessus ne sont pas pondérés.

Description

Univers
If o6 in 1
Unité de réponse
Interviewer
Retourner au catalogue
Catalogue d'enquêtes et de données de l'Ined

Site de l'Ined | Mentions légales
© Ined, All Rights Reserved.